Author Archives: Ruth Steinberger

Cody Wayne Hahn Convicted in Creek County

posted January 26th, 2012 by
Sammy

by Ruth Steinberger

WARNING! The accompanying picture is very graphic!

Cody Hahn was convicted of animal cruelty on January 26 in Creek County.  This is a victory for everyone who cares about halting violence in communities across our state.  Hahn will serve one year in Creek County jail with the remainder of a five year sentence suspended and he was ordered to pay $3300 in restitution.

In October, 2008 Creek County Deputy Charles Redfern responded to a call from a caller who had seen someone intentionally tie a dog to the back of a pickup truck and then drive the truck at high speed down a gravel road.  The dog that Oklahomans have come to know as, ‘Sammy,’ was nearly skinned alive and the gruesome crime shocked northeast Oklahoma.

Deputy Redfern immediately called for assistance for the severely injured dog. The dog was transported to Bristow Animal Hospital where he received intensive treatment.   Within three weeks Deputy Redfern had identified Cody Hahn of Creek County as a suspect in the case.

Since then Creek County has witnessed a legal case that pitted a young man with too much financial resource and too little conscience against a determined sheriff’s office and prosecutor.

TulsaPets Magazine

This is what Cody Wayne Hahn just admitted that he intentionally did to the dog now known as Sammy.

All studies show that this type of crime often emboldens the perpetrator to escalate their violence to include people; indeed according to the FBI all serial killers started out ‘practicing’ on animals.  Folks from across the nation applauded the efforts of the Creek County Sheriff’s Office to solve the crime.

Once charged with the crime, Cody Hahn (then 21) used high-priced legal counsel to help him ‘get off.’   Animal welfare organizations posted a reward to attract additional witnesses and kept a vigil at each courtroom appearance.  Cody Hahn appeared grinning in all photos and never acknowledged the severity of the crime for which he was accused.  Ultimately in 2010 Hahn texted an intimidating message to a witness.  By that point the family members who had gathered to support him had largely vanished and he was finally represented by a court appointed attorney.

Hahn’s early legal team tried every angle to challenge Oklahoma’s anti-cruelty statutes.  At one point attorney Creekmore Wallace of Sapulpa postulated that if statutes protected a stray (thereby valueless) dog from being skinned alive, possibly our statutes could be used to criminalize someone who stepped on a bug.

Hahn’s arrogance lost, and his legal counsel’s maneuvering failed.

And today, as he was convicted of animal cruelty, decent people everywhere won big time!

We Can Stop the Suffering

posted January 9th, 2012 by
Rabies Photo IIB

Dr. Xianfu Wu, Dr. Charles Rupprecht, Ruth Steinberger

By Ruth Steinberger

Photos by Fabiola Alvarez

Rabies kills tens of thousands of people in impoverished nations each year.  While many people may be surprised by the fact that people die of rabies today, most are shocked to learn that dogs are the vectors in over 95 percent of rabies cases in humans.

an embedded rabies immunocontraceptive target

A family pet visits the spay neuter clinic in Colima in 2011. Volunteers who gather donated supplies hold clinics as often as possible but the numbers are too great to even make a dent without the help of a sterilent for female dogs.

According to the Global Alliance for Rabies Control (GARC), an estimated 375 million homeless dogs exist worldwide—three quarters of all dogs born.  Over 80 percent of unwanted dogs are born in nations in which animals are not protected under the law and where rabies is a genuine human health threat.  Official methods for killing dogs in rabies-plagued nations include clubbing, electrocution, poisoning, drowning and intentional starvation.

an embedded rabies immunocontraceptive target

People waiting near the check-in for the spay neuter clinic, Colima, 2011. Living in poverty there is little money to care for the dogs. Most public facilities in Mexico are operated as "anti-rabicos" meaning they collect the dogs as a prevention against rabies. Most anti-rabicos kill the dogs by electrocution.

Indeed, on a worldwide scale, more dogs are killed by electrocution, clubbing and poisoning than by humane injection; fear of rabies is the number one reason for these aggressive killing programs.  The good news, however, is that a vaccine which could, at once, prevent rabies and pregnancy in dogs may be on the horizon, and GARC is embarking on a campaign to raise the funds to begin the testing of this vaccine in dogs. To begin, at least $150,000 must be raised to move forward.

Researchers, Dr. Xianfu Wu and Dr. Charles Rupprecht, of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC), have developed a rabies vaccine with an embedded immunocontraceptive target, which has prevented litters in 80 percent of vaccinated female mice.  The vaccine would require a commercial partner and must be approved by regulatory authorities. If this combined rabies/ contraceptive vaccine is determined to be effective in preventing dogs from becoming pregnant, it could revolutionize animal welfare while also preventing and eliminating rabies in developing nations, effectively ending the worst horrors facing unwanted dogs in numbers that are impossible by any other means.  The average life of a street dog is just two years.  Preventing unwanted litters by sterilizing owned females obviously halts the main source of street dogs.

an embedded rabies immunocontraceptive target

Boys on tribal lands in the US play safely with a dog that has been spayed and vaccinated against rabies.

By piggybacking on rabies vaccination programs, this vaccine could provide population control in places where high-volume surgical sterilization for dogs and cats is still decades away, or even in places where dogs and cats are viewed as vermin and providing medical care to them may not be considered valuable.

“Although most developing nations lack animal welfare facilities, such as shelters, much less having spay/neuter programs, many do have rabies control programs,” says Esther Mechler, originator of Spay USA and founder of Marian’s Dream, an animal welfare foundation. Mechler points out that the rabies component could dramatically increase the number of public agencies willing and able to administer the product, essentially taking some of the burden off of the animal welfare community while increasing efficiency in animal welfare efforts.TulsaPets Magazine

In addition to being unconscionably cruel, collecting and killing stray dogs is generally ineffective at stopping the disease because whether or not owned dogs are vaccinated, intact females have litters which replenish the numbers of potential rabies vectors each year.  The outcome is not simply theoretical; rabies produces a violent death as the central nervous system is destroyed by the virus, and, tragically, 40 percent of those who die of rabies are children.  Mechler says, “It’s exciting that this [CDC] team is working on solving these two serious problems together and will be helping the people and the animals both with this one product.”

an embedded rabies immunocontraceptive target

Prevention is the only alternative to collecting and killing, and where there are free-roaming animals, the efforts must focus on females. Male animals are often cited as having a theoretical number of potential offspring which is quite high.  However, sterilizing male animals has no effect on whether or not the females go into estrus and attract males from afar.

Currently, the research is on hold due to the lack of funding; therefore,  GARC’s fundraising efforts are starting immediately.  “Finding a feasible answer to humanely reduce the dog population is probably the single most important missing tool in the battle to reduce the burden of rabies across the globe,” Professor Deborah Briggs, executive director of Global Alliance for Rabies Control, says.

an embedded rabies immunocontraceptive target

Kids hold their cats in pillow cases waiting for them to be spayed.

“Supporting research on the development of an immunocontraceptive could save millions of dogs from being slaughtered in the name of rabies control and revolutionize rabies control strategies.”

Coming September 17…www.SpayFirst.org

posted September 16th, 2011 by
Spay First Logo 2

 

Spay FIRST! announces the launching of a new website designed to explain the importance of spay neuter and also to provide comprehensive information on starting, expanding or increasing the efficiency of rural spay neuter programs.  From private practice partnerships to mobile spay neuter clinics, Spay FIRST! offers ideas that will help map out the way.

Our “get informed…get involved” website will answer…

  • Why is spay neuter the “first strike” in reducing the number of euthanasias, abandonments and incidents of animal neglect?
  • How can a community with no animal shelter begin to reduce animal suffering and the number of dogs and cats needing emergency help even before a shelter is being considered?
  • Why are spay neuter ordinances a positive step for communities trying to reduce the number of unwanted litters and how can we help them succeed?

The Spay FIRST! website will feature a sharing space in which organizations and organizers are welcome to share tips on programs, outreach, ideas, education and more. 

Breaking The Cycle Of Chains

posted July 15th, 2011 by

by Ruth Steinberger

Holly Lytle, a Tulsa-based animal advocate whose desire to help dogs that are living in dismal, dire circumstances, is the recently named Oklahoma representative for Dogs Deserve Better, a nationwide organization dedicated to eradicating the practice of chaining and penning dogs.
Dogs Deserve Better (DDB) was founded nine years ago by Tamira Ci Thayne to assist chained dogs through intervention, education and legislation and now has representatives in 38 states.
The national organization recently purchased the Virginia mansion formerly owned by convicted dog fighter Michael Vick.
The 16-acre estate will become the Good Newz Rehab Center for Chained and Penned Dogs.
Lytle says volunteering with DDB is her way “to make the biggest difference” for dogs.
“Basically, I was looking at getting into rescue, but through DDB, I realized that was the way I could have the greatest impact.
“If I rescue one dog, it helps that one dog. If a dog-owner releases a chained dog, he may go get another (dog which will be chained).
Our goal is not to have one dog simply replace the last one.
“By working with (the people in) homes with chained dogs to get them off the chain, into the home, and on walks, I can break a cycle at that home. Hopefully forever.
“When it comes to chained dogs, there is nowhere for the concerned people to turn to get help for them.
Unless there are laws specifically against chaining, if a chained dog has food, water and some type of shelter, people who are concerned about a dog are left to watch them suffer.
(There are no state or local regulations against chaining or penning dogs. Oklahoma cruelty statutes minimally require food, water, shelter.) “A dog house is not shelter. In the summer a dog house in the sun is hotter than the ambient air temperature outside,” she explains.
“Our goal is not to take the dog from the home. Our goal is to educate the people and to improve the life of the dog that is there.” Lytle helps people with needs that stretch beyond a lack of money for fencing. Food and funds for spays or neuters are tops on her wish list. She explains that taking the dog (to rescue) is a last resort.
She visits homes in impoverished communities to educate pet owners and bring them the resources needed to give the pets a better quality of life.
Sometimes that’s dog food, sometimes it’s a spay or neuter, and sometimes it’s more.
“Some of the owners truly care about their dogs, but are uneducated about pet care or simply don’t have the resources to do more.” Regardless of how the owners feel about their dogs, Lytle calls it a “disconnect” that enables people to live inside a home while a dependent animal is chained outside in extreme weather, often hungry and always in filth.
“Chaining and penning are prison sentences. There is a lack of socialization, they’re mentally and physically deprived and literally, every single chained dog I’ve worked with has had a filthy doghouse.
“The so-called shelter is horrid. They freeze in the winter; they suffer in the summer and they are at the prey of bigger dogs and even people who may steal them to use for fighting bait.” And Lytle points out that the outcome is not only an unnatural and unhappy life for the dog, but it’s a safety issue for the owners and the neighbors as well.
Chained dogs become territorial; they become aggressive about their limited piece of dirt and are three times more likely to bite than a dog not on a chain.
“Why would a person subject their dog to this,” Lytle comments.
Breaking this cycle of chaining and penning is the goal. “There are times you go to the home and the kids aren’t in school properly and things are in disarray and at other times it is people who were just dealt a rough hand in life and they need some help.”
Lytle is the lead technician at Spay Oklahoma South clinic in Bixby and, additionally, she works with rural, mobile spay/neuter clinics.
She says that if people would responsibly spay and neuter their animals, most of those she assists would not have become a chained dog.
“The (people in) homes I work with didn’t go to a shelter and get a dog; they didn’t go buy a dog.
They found one and took it home and it went on a chain. It really all comes down to the numbers.” In the meantime, Lytle will continue working to improve the welfare of those dogs whose lives have fallen between the cracks and who are victims of a very lonely lifestyle.
Many communities across the country have enacted or are considering city regulations or legislation to prevent dogs from spending their lives on chains.
Lytle says an education drive to move this issue forward in Oklahoma is long overdue, adding that even an ordinance which limits the number of hours a dog can be chained would be a starting place.
But, until that initiative gets underway, she’ll keep spreading the word that dogs which are a part of a family are safer and happier and that placing a dog on a chain is never a compassionate thing to do.

Watch for Red Flags in Ads

posted May 15th, 2011 by

By Ruth Steinberger

The puppy mill issue remains in the headlines in Oklahoma, and although they are covered under breeder regulations passed in 2010, high-volume kitten producers are rarely mentioned. Kittens that are sold in pet stores, over the Internet or through newspaper ads often come from unregulated facilities with too many cats and too little oversight. With all the talk about puppy mills, few people think about kitten mills.

The puppy mill issue remains in the headlines in Oklahoma, and although they are covered under breeder regulations passed in 2010, high-volume kitten producers are rarely mentioned.
Kittens that are sold in pet stores, over the Internet or through newspaper ads often come from unregulated facilities with too many cats and too little oversight.
With all the talk about puppy mills, few people think about kitten mills.
Whether it is because far more dogs are purchased overall than cats, or that mixed breed cats carry less stigma than their canine brethren, the discussion of mass production of companion animals usually centers on dogs.
The term “kitten mill” refers to facility in which kittens are produced for profit, in poor conditions, with little or no human contact.
Buildings with cages crammed full of cats which are bred until disease or overuse requires them to be put down may not be as common as high volume puppy producing facilities.
High volume kitten-sellers rely mainly on direct marketing, primarily because USDA licensing is only required for breeders who sell animals to brokers who then re-sell them to pet stores and because most brokers and transporters do not buy kittens to resell.
They escape USDA licensing and often slide in under the wire. In states which lack high volume breeder regulations, those selling kittens bypass licensing requirements altogether. Yet, they are there.
Classified newspaper listings for purebred kittens along with Internet sites reveal that while not nearly of the size and scope of puppy sellers, those selling cheap purebred kittens by the litter are present throughout Oklahoma.
It’s not hard to spot kitten mills when browsing the classifieds. Ads placed by someone looking to make a quick buck will offer kittens that are priced well below average (for example at $50 to $150 each) and may state that the kittens do not have registration papers, or that they are registered with an unknown registry instead of CFA (Cat Fanciers’ Association, which is the equivalent of the AKC – American Kennel Club – for dogs).
Another sign of a kitten mill is a lack of health records with no veterinary reference available, or kittens being sold with existing health issues which may last a lifetime, including serious respiratory ailments.
Other warning signs include a seller who is more interested in collecting the money then the quality of the home where the kitten is going. Buyers should avoid any breeder who offers to meet them instead of allowing the buyer to come to the seller’s home or facility.
Additionally, as in purebred puppies, many veterinary resources note disorders which are common in purebred kittens.
Genetic problems may include fecal incontinence in some Manx cats, vision problems in Siamese and other health issues in other breeds.
A kitten mill will avoid the expense of testing or the owner may even be unaware of the need to screen the cats used for breeding. An April Tulsa World ad cited extra toes as a selling point.
The word “rare,” may mask abnormalities which have associated health problems, and it is used as a cover for scams. Some people selling unusual cross breeds may advertise them as “rare,” leading people to think they are getting a unique treasure.
Camille Hulen, owner of Camille’s Cat House and an animal welfare advocate, says, “If you buy a purebred animal from a breeder, an animal in a shelter will die because you did not choose it. Discourage breeding by not supporting it.
“Also, if you must have a purebred, go to a purebred rescue organization.” Hulen continues, “When people seek out the purebred they usually do so from a lack of knowledge. They really haven’t seen the cats and it has been my experience that those who seek an animal based on “pictures” alone are among the first to give it up because it did not meet their expectations. For this reason, there are many, many purebreds available.”

Whether it is because far more dogs are purchased overall than cats, or that mixed breed cats carry less stigma than their canine brethren, the discussion of mass production of companion animals usually centers on dogs. The term “kitten mill” refers to facility in which kittens are produced for profit, in poor conditions, with little or no human contact. Buildings with cages crammed full of cats which are bred until disease or overuse requires them to be put down may not be as common as high volume puppy producing facilities.

High volume kitten-sellers rely mainly on direct marketing, primarily because USDA licensing is only required for breeders who sell animals to brokers who then re-sell them to pet stores and because most brokers and transporters do not buy kittens to resell. They escape USDA licensing and often slide in under the wire. In states which lack high volume breeder regulations, those selling kittens bypass licensing requirements altogether. Yet, they are there. Classified newspaper listings for purebred kittens along with Internet sites reveal that while not nearly of the size and scope of puppy sellers, those selling cheap purebred kittens by the litter are present throughout Oklahoma.

It’s not hard to spot kitten mills when browsing the classifieds. Ads placed by someone looking to make a quick buck will offer kittens that are priced well below average (for example at $50 to $150 each) and may state that the kittens do not have registration papers, or that they are registered with an unknown registry instead of CFA (Cat Fanciers’ Association, which is the equivalent of the AKC – American Kennel Club – for dogs).

Another sign of a kitten mill is a lack of health records with no veterinary reference available, or kittens being sold with existing health issues which may last a lifetime, including serious respiratory ailments. Other warning signs include a seller who is more interested in collecting the money then the quality of the home where the kitten is going. Buyers should avoid any breeder who offers to meet them instead of allowing the buyer to come to the seller’s home or facility.
Additionally, as in purebred puppies, many veterinary resources note disorders which are common in purebred kittens.

Genetic problems may include fecal incontinence in some Manx cats, vision problems in Siamese and other health issues in other breeds.
A kitten mill will avoid the expense of testing or the owner may even be unaware of the need to screen the cats used for breeding. An April Tulsa World ad cited extra toes as a selling point.

The word “rare,” may mask abnormalities which have associated health problems, and it is used as a cover for scams. Some people selling unusual cross breeds may advertise them as “rare,” leading people to think they are getting a unique treasure.

Camille Hulen, owner of Camille’s Cat House and an animal welfare advocate, says, “If you buy a purebred animal from a breeder, an animal in a shelter will die because you did not choose it. Discourage breeding by not supporting it. “Also, if you must have a purebred, go to a purebred rescue organization.” Hulen continues, “When people seek out the purebred they usually do so from a lack of knowledge. They really haven’t seen the cats and it has been my experience that those who seek an animal based on “pictures” alone are among the first to give it up because it did not meet their expectations. For this reason, there are many, many purebreds available.”

The puppy mill issue remains in the headlines in Oklahoma, and although they are covered under breeder regulations passed in 2010, high-volume kitten producers are rarely mentioned.
Kittens that are sold in pet stores, over the Internet or through newspaper ads often come from unregulated facilities with too many cats and too little oversight.
With all the talk about puppy mills, few people think about kitten mills.
Whether it is because far more dogs are purchased overall than cats, or that mixed breed cats carry less stigma than their canine brethren, the discussion of mass production of companion animals usually centers on dogs.
The term “kitten mill” refers to facility in which kittens are produced for profit, in poor conditions, with little or no human contact.
Buildings with cages crammed full of cats which are bred until disease or overuse requires them to be put down may not be as common as high volume puppy producing facilities.
High volume kitten-sellers rely mainly on direct marketing, primarily because USDA licensing is only required for breeders who sell animals to brokers who then re-sell them to pet stores and because most brokers and transporters do not buy kittens to resell.
They escape USDA licensing and often slide in under the wire. In states which lack high volume breeder regulations, those selling kittens bypass licensing requirements altogether. Yet, they are there.
Classified newspaper listings for purebred kittens along with Internet sites reveal that while not nearly of the size and scope of puppy sellers, those selling cheap purebred kittens by the litter are present throughout Oklahoma.
It’s not hard to spot kitten mills when browsing the classifieds. Ads placed by someone looking to make a quick buck will offer kittens that are priced well below average (for example at $50 to $150 each) and may state that the kittens do not have registration papers, or that they are registered with an unknown registry instead of CFA (Cat Fanciers’ Association, which is the equivalent of the AKC – American Kennel Club – for dogs).
Another sign of a kitten mill is a lack of health records with no veterinary reference available, or kittens being sold with existing health issues which may last a lifetime, including serious respiratory ailments.
Other warning signs include a seller who is more interested in collecting the money then the quality of the home where the kitten is going. Buyers should avoid any breeder who offers to meet them instead of allowing the buyer to come to the seller’s home or facility.
Additionally, as in purebred puppies, many veterinary resources note disorders which are common in purebred kittens.
Genetic problems may include fecal incontinence in some Manx cats, vision problems in Siamese and other health issues in other breeds.
A kitten mill will avoid the expense of testing or the owner may even be unaware of the need to screen the cats used for breeding. An April Tulsa World ad cited extra toes as a selling point.
The word “rare,” may mask abnormalities which have associated health problems, and it is used as a cover for scams. Some people selling unusual cross breeds may advertise them as “rare,” leading people to think they are getting a unique treasure.
Camille Hulen, owner of Camille’s Cat House and an animal welfare advocate, says, “If you buy a purebred animal from a breeder, an animal in a shelter will die because you did not choose it. Discourage breeding by not supporting it.
“Also, if you must have a purebred, go to a purebred rescue organization.” Hulen continues, “When people seek out the purebred they usually do so from a lack of knowledge. They really haven’t seen the cats and it has been my experience that those who seek an animal based on “pictures” alone are among the first to give it up because it did not meet their expectations. For this reason, there are many, many purebreds available.”

So me tips:
• Visit the breeder to see the facility.
• Do not buy from a pet shop.
• Do not buy online or mail order.
• Ask the breeder for a veterinarian reference. Does the animal have immunization records?

SB 637 Ready for Vote

posted May 4th, 2011 by
Oklahoma Capitol

by Ruth Steinberger. 

Tulsa Pets Magazine reached Dr Brian Renegar, (D-McAlester) for an update on SB 637 and the status of the pending regulations of high volume breeders in Oklahoma.  Representative Renegar is a co-author of SB 637, a bill introduced by Senator Charles Wyrick which created a compromise in the proposed rules of the new Commercial Pet Breeders Board and which enabled the rules to reach the governor’s desk this session.      

      SB 637 is scheduled to be voted on this week although it could come to the floor as late as next week.   If you have not reached your legislators to express your support for SB 637, now is the time to do so.

      Following an outcry by breeders regarding the original regulations proposed by the board, there was a groundswell of support in the Oklahoma legislature to overturn the entire measure which created the agency through a measure which passed in 2010.  Renegar’s compromise addresses breeders’ concerns while strengthening the ability of the agency to do its job.  Originally the amendments made by Renegar enabled the new agency to issue directives, an action in case of disease or other emergencies. At the request of the governor’s legal staff, that portion of the amendment was removed.

       Renegar pointed out that SB 637 passed the house last week with a margin of 90 to five, showing that an overwhelming number of legislators support the measure and are ready to move forward.

        Renegar said, “This compromise gives some relief to the breeders, but leaves rules in place which address the ones that are operating below acceptable standards.”

        Renegar was asked to comment for Tulsa Pets Magazine. He said, “Not as a legislator but as a veterinarian I look forward to this going into effect.  Probably 95 percent of breeders try to do a good job, this will address those that don’t.  I know people wanted the regulations…my sole idea was to help those dogs that exist in horrible conditions.”

Page 1 of 6123456